IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i3p1338-1348id5528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance with personal protective equipment use among clay works employees

Author

Listed:
  • J. Niyitegeka
  • I. Kibirige
  • D. R. Mutekanga

Abstract

This study examined how personal factors—knowledge and attitudes—and company factors—commitment, availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), adequacy of equipment, and work arrangements—are compliant with the use of PPE among Clay Works factory employees. Failure to comply results in occupational health problems. Hence, there is a need to examine both personal and institutional factors in this factory. The study employed descriptive and analytical cross-sectional research designs with qualitative and quantitative data collection approaches. Data were collected from a purposively selected 133 employees and 5 management staff of Unique Clay Works Limited. Quantitative data were collected using a questionnaire, which was distributed to all 133 respondents. Qualitative data were collected using face-to-face interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using coding. The results show that the level of compliance with the use of PPE was low (30.1%). The regression-adjusted odds ratio shows that females are 4.95% more likely to comply than males. At the same time, commitment by management accounted for 17.56% (p < 0.05). It is recommended that employers consider gender as an important factor regarding PPE compliance in the company and that companies uphold PPE compliance and also assess productivity as a consequence of compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Niyitegeka & I. Kibirige & D. R. Mutekanga, 2025. "Compliance with personal protective equipment use among clay works employees," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(3), pages 1338-1348.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:1338-1348:id:5528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/5528/1995
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:1338-1348:id:5528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.