IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i2p413-424id4496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of accountability pressure and time budget on the quality of audit services of independent auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thi Thu Hien
  • Dang Anh Tuan

Abstract

Audit quality has always been a top priority in conducting audit work, as it is essential for maintaining stakeholder trust and addressing its complexities. This study examines how various auditor characteristics impact audit service quality. Primary data were collected in 2024 through a survey of 110 auditors working at independent audit firms, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 28 statistical software. The results indicate that auditor competence, independence, accountability, and time budget pressure all have a significant effect on audit service quality. Among these, auditor competence emerges as the most influential factor, followed closely by independence and accountability. This finding emphasizes the importance of competence and independence in ensuring high-quality audit work within a complex professional environment. Additionally, accountability and time budget pressure serve as catalysts that can influence whether the quality of work is high or low. From a practical perspective, these results suggest the need to enhance the quality of audit professionals and to implement mechanisms that ensure auditors maintain their independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thi Thu Hien & Dang Anh Tuan, 2025. "The impact of accountability pressure and time budget on the quality of audit services of independent auditors," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(2), pages 413-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:413-424:id:4496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4496/1724
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:413-424:id:4496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.