IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i2p1920-1635id4849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional capacity, faculty capability, and research productivity in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Ronora Sevilla Malaga

Abstract

A strong research culture serves as a catalyst for the fulfillment of educational institutions' vision and mission. Predicated on the positivistic paradigm, the paper determined the role of research capability as a mediator in the relationship between institutional capacity and productivity in the research of HEIs' faculty in one province in the central Philippines. The paper employed descriptive and moderated mediation analyses utilizing the Research Capacity, Capability, and Productivity Metrics (RCCPM) for data collection. Forty-three HEIs and 356 faculty respondents participated in the study. Findings revealed that the faculty perceived HEIs' institutional capacity in research and their capability in research as moderate. Conversely, research production was extremely low. Applying the mediation analysis, institutional capacity influences faculty capability in research, which in turn impacts research productivity. Based on the findings, HEIs, together with allied agencies, need to boost faculty knowledge and skills in research to ensure improved productivity in research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronora Sevilla Malaga, 2025. "Institutional capacity, faculty capability, and research productivity in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(2), pages 1920-1635.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1920-1635:id:4849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4849/1826
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1920-1635:id:4849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.