IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i2p1803-1829id4929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of machine learning algorithms in predicting hospital readmissions for diabetic patients

Author

Listed:
  • Shefqet Meda
  • Lily Cuku
  • Zhilbert Tafa

Abstract

Hospital readmission is a substantial burden on healthcare systems, increasing both costs and patient strain. Current traditional methods for identifying patients at high risk for readmission are often based on clinicians' judgment. This issue is especially concerning for patients with chronic conditions like diabetes, where the pressure to reduce readmissions may lead to worse outcomes. Unlike traditional methods, machine learning algorithms can analyze complex datasets to identify patterns and risk factors, resulting in more precise predictions of readmission risk. They can also facilitate better resource allocation and personalized patient care. Previous studies have applied various algorithms to predict readmissions in healthcare institutions. In this study, we apply and compare the optimized versions of different machine learning (ML) models to predict 30-day readmissions and identify important predictors driving these outcomes. Based on the predefined metrics, the analyses identify the Stochastic Gradient Descent Classifier (SGDC) as the best-performing model for the available dataset and the applied ML parameter optimization. Although ML models demonstrate potential for predicting readmissions, they are not yet fully reliable.

Suggested Citation

  • Shefqet Meda & Lily Cuku & Zhilbert Tafa, 2025. "Comparison of machine learning algorithms in predicting hospital readmissions for diabetic patients," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(2), pages 1803-1829.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1803-1829:id:4929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4929/1842
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1803-1829:id:4929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.