IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i2p1429-1438id4776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of single-pulse and two-pulse echo signals in cobalt micropowders and nanowires

Author

Listed:
  • T. Gavasheli
  • G. Mamniashvili
  • T. Gegechkori
  • G. Donadze

Abstract

This study compares the behavior of two-pulse and single-pulse echo signals in cobalt micropowders and nanowires. In the first instance, the analysis focused on the influence of an additional magnetic video pulse on the echo signals in cobalt micropowders. The findings confirm the edge mechanism responsible for single-pulse echo formation in cobalt micropowders, where the fronts of the radio-frequency pulse act analogously to the radio-frequency pulses in the two-pulse Hahn echo technique. In the second instance, the radiofrequency resonant magnetometry method evaluated the coercive force of cobalt nanowires embedded in a polymer matrix and polarized by a magnetic field. The two-pulse and single-pulse echo signals were also examined during the magnetization and remagnetization of cobalt nanowires in this sample. The results also align with the conclusion that the edge mechanism underpins single-pulse echo signal formation in this context. Understanding the SPE formation mechanism is crucial for exploring phenomena such as multiple TPE signals, cumulative echoes, and the use of magnets as spin processors.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Gavasheli & G. Mamniashvili & T. Gegechkori & G. Donadze, 2025. "Comparative analysis of single-pulse and two-pulse echo signals in cobalt micropowders and nanowires," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(2), pages 1429-1438.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1429-1438:id:4776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4776/1811
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1429-1438:id:4776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.