IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i2p1-7id4407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps muscle after modified hybrid training with NMES in untrained healthy subjects

Author

Listed:
  • Putri Ayu Madedi Budiawan
  • Damayanti Tinduh
  • Yudith Dian Prawitri
  • Soenarnatalina Melaniani

Abstract

Reduced muscle strength is often caused by decreased of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle. Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Russian Protocol and hybrid training system are alternative methods for strengthening exercises to increase muscle strength. This study aimed to analyze the effect of Hybrid modification strengthening exercise and Russian NMES protocol on Quadriceps Femoris muscle strength in healthy untrained subjects. Twenty-four subject, untrained healthy male aged 25-45 years, divided into the Modified Hybrid Training (MHT) Group (n=12) and the Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Group (n=12). Both groups received intervention 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions). Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) of quadriceps muscle measured before and after intervention. There was improvement in the MVIC of quadriceps muscle in MHT group (dominant limb p = 0.001, non-dominant limb p = 0.001) and NMES group (dominant limb p = 0.001, non-dominant limb p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change of MVIC (ΔMVIC) of the quadriceps muscle between the Hybrid method and NMES groups on both legs. Both Modified Hybrid Training (MHT) and the Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) are effective in increasing quadriceps muscle MVIC with comparable result.

Suggested Citation

  • Putri Ayu Madedi Budiawan & Damayanti Tinduh & Yudith Dian Prawitri & Soenarnatalina Melaniani, 2025. "Comparison of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps muscle after modified hybrid training with NMES in untrained healthy subjects," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1-7:id:4407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4407/1690
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:1-7:id:4407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.