IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p8833-8847id3880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminatory indices of ‘introduction to psychology’ multiple choice examination questions

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Adedayo, ODUKOYA
  • Dare Ojo, OMONIJO

Abstract

This study investigated the discriminatory indices of the multiple choice questions of a compulsory undergraduate course (Introduction to Psychology) in a private Nigerian university. The main research question raised was: Did all the items in the ‘Introduction to Psychology’ examination discriminate adequately between low scoring and high scoring students? To answer this question, the discriminatory index was derived for all the 70 items fielded in the examination. Though 255 students took this course, only students whose total scores fell within the topmost and lowest quartiles participated in this study. Students with missing data were extracted from the topmost and lowest quartiles. Consequently, the data of 100 students (50 in the topmost quartile and 50 in the lowest quartile) were utilized in computing the Discriminatory indices (Di) of the 70 Multiple Choice Questions. Out of the 70 items, two (2.9%) furnished poor Di, fifteen items (21.4%) had weak Di, fourteen items (20%) had fair Di, and thirty-nine items (55.7%) had fairly strong and strong Di. The findings are discussed and relevant recommendations made.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Adedayo, ODUKOYA & Dare Ojo, OMONIJO, 2024. "Discriminatory indices of ‘introduction to psychology’ multiple choice examination questions," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 8833-8847.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:8833-8847:id:3880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/3880/1475
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:8833-8847:id:3880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.