IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p8514-8533id3826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing of phosphate and ammonium removal from wastewater using modified zeolite: A response surface methodology approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Nabeel
  • Ammar Salman Dawood

Abstract

Nutrient contamination of wastewater, especially phosphate and ammonium, is a growing problem that poses major environmental and human health risks in terms of eutrophication and loss of biodiversity. Traditional methods for wastewater treatment may be highly effective, but they often come at a significant economic cost as well as environmental drawbacks. To maximize this nutrient removal these nutrients are removed using modified zeolite which is low-cost and highly effective. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is used in this study to enhance nutrient retention conditions, regardless of pH, contact time, and amount of adsorbent. A Central Composite Design (CCD) was then applied to study as extensively as possible the influence of these factors on this adsorption process. In important results, the alternative zeolite demonstrates 93.9% and 73% removal efficiencies for phosphate and ammonium under optimal conditions, respectively, suggesting a better performance of the modified zeolite compared to unmodified counterparts. These results highlight the promise presented by modified zeolite as a sustainable approach to enhancing current wastewater treatments in meeting or exceeding stringent environmental standards and minimizing eutrophication threats. This work is groundbreaking as it addresses large-scale nutrient pollution with a possible solution that has low cost and environmental impacts with the remedy provided by modified zeolite in wastewater treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Nabeel & Ammar Salman Dawood, 2024. "Optimizing of phosphate and ammonium removal from wastewater using modified zeolite: A response surface methodology approach," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 8514-8533.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:8514-8533:id:3826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/3826/1446
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:8514-8533:id:3826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.