IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p6544-6556id3408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bio-inspired optimization technique for optimal beam angle selection in radiotherapy application

Author

Listed:
  • Keshav Kumar K.
  • NVSL Narasimham
  • A Ramakrishna Prasad

Abstract

A human planner's expertise is currently the most important consideration for determining optimal beam angles for external beam radiotherapy. The necessity of automatically selecting beam angles is especially important in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) since fewer modulated beams are utilized in conformal radiotherapy. For an automated beam angle selection (ABAS) approach, the ideal coplanar beam angles correspond to the lowest objective function (OF) value of the dose distributions produced from this collection of candidate beams' intensity-modulated maps. Because of the task's intricacy and the large search space concerned, the ABAS and optimization of intensity maps are addressed independently and repeatedly. The Modified Artificial Bee Colony (MABC) optimization, the integration of Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and a Firefly algorithm are employed to choose suitable beam angles, and the conjugate gradient (CG) technique is employed to fasten the optimized intensity maps for every selected beam. A 3D full scatter convolution (FSC) approach based on the pencil beam is employed for dose assessment. The effectiveness of MABC is examined using a more difficult instance representing a prostate tumor, and 2 simple cases The simulated MABC output is compared to the ABC optimization method. The results illustrate the reliability and efficiency of the suggested MABC-based ABAS can improve dosage distributions with clinically acceptable computation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Keshav Kumar K. & NVSL Narasimham & A Ramakrishna Prasad, 2024. "Bio-inspired optimization technique for optimal beam angle selection in radiotherapy application," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 6544-6556.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:6544-6556:id:3408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/3408/1282
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:6544-6556:id:3408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.