IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p3313-3326id2711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid BiLSTM-CNN deep learning model for Chinese sentiment analysis of online car reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Dongmei Lee
  • Dingran Wang
  • Wen Zhang
  • Zhihong Song

Abstract

Although sentiment analysis with datasets in English has achieved significant progress, there are still relatively few studies on sentiment analysis in the area of Chinesecar review texts. In addition, the existing Chinese text sentiment analysis methods cannot simultaneously extract the contextual features and the local semantic information from the review texts. To address the above issues, a hybrid deep learning model namely BiLSTM-CNN was designed and validated with Chinese car review texts. We trained word vectors with the CBOW model by combining the Chinese Wikipedia corpus with other open-source car-related corpora. Such word vectors include car-specific vocabulary, which improves sentimental classification accuracy. Experimental results show that the performance indices of the deep learning models (CNN, LSTM, BiLSTM) are much better than the KNN, SVM, Naïve Bayes, and RF model, which is attributed to deep learning's powerful feature extraction ability and nonlinear fitting ability. Furthermore, when compared to deep learning models such as CNN, LSTM, BiLSTM, and LSTM-CNN, the suggested hybrid BiLSTM-CNN model outperformed the others. The results may provide references for consumers to buy a car and for car companies to optimize their products.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongmei Lee & Dingran Wang & Wen Zhang & Zhihong Song, 2024. "A hybrid BiLSTM-CNN deep learning model for Chinese sentiment analysis of online car reviews," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 3313-3326.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:3313-3326:id:2711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2711/1021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:3313-3326:id:2711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.