IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p1240-1257id2234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional pressure and corporate green innovation—the influence of knowledge management process

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Ke
  • Thitinant Wareewanich

Abstract

Using a multiple linear regression model constructed on data from construction firms in a province in eastern China, we investigated the impact of three types of institutional pressures from outside the firm on corporate green innovation and how the three knowledge management processes affect the relationship between them. We found that all three institutional pressures significantly positively impact corporate green innovation, with normative pressure having the most significant impact on corporate green innovation, followed by coercive pressure. The results also indicate that all three institutional pressures have an important mediating effect on green innovation through knowledge integration. Knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing do not moderate the relationship between imitative pressure and green innovation. Thus, the findings emphasize the importance of institutional pressure and its role through knowledge integration for firms to achieve green innovation. The findings also emphasize the need to differentiate between similarities and differences between organizations to understand the impact of knowledge sharing on the relationship between institutional pressure and green innovation, thus increasing research on the conditions under which knowledge sharing contributes to green innovation in firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Ke & Thitinant Wareewanich, 2024. "Institutional pressure and corporate green innovation—the influence of knowledge management process," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 1240-1257.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1240-1257:id:2234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2234/859
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1240-1257:id:2234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.