IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p1148-1161id2217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interplay of language proficiency, gender, test anxiety, and cognitive strategies: The spectrum of guessing behaviors in multiple-choice assessments among Saudi EFL learners

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Al Fraidan

Abstract

This study investigates the spectrum of guessing behaviors among 80 Saudi EFL learners within multiple-choice tests, emphasizing the influence of language proficiency, test anxiety, gender differences, and strategic decision-making. A novel category, “Guessing with Partial Knowledge,” related to language attrition, highlights how foundational yet incomplete language knowledge shapes guessing strategies. This addition complements traditional categories from blind guessing to strategic, knowledge-based guessing. The analysis reveals that higher proficiency students are prone to educated guessing utilizing deep linguistic insights and contextual cues, whereas those with lower proficiency might rely on simpler heuristics. Notably, gender differences emerged, with female students displaying more cautious and methodical guessing approaches compared to the often-impulsive strategies of male students. This study advocates for educational strategies that bolster language retention, strategic guessing, and address the nuanced needs of male and female learners in test-taking scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Al Fraidan, 2024. "Interplay of language proficiency, gender, test anxiety, and cognitive strategies: The spectrum of guessing behaviors in multiple-choice assessments among Saudi EFL learners," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 1148-1161.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1148-1161:id:2217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2217/852
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1148-1161:id:2217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.