Author
Listed:
- Chérifa Boudia
- Krismadinata
Abstract
This study explores the integration of ChatGPT into Social Learning Analytics (SLA) to support programming education among computer science students at Mustapha Stambouli University, Mascara, Algeria. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative surveys and qualitative analysis of recorded interactions of one example and interviews to examine the effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of ChatGPT’s use in programming tasks across Arabic, French, and English. The study involved 57 students and five teachers, providing a comprehensive view of ChatGPT’s impact on learning experiences, engagement patterns, and programming performance. Results indicate that ChatGPT is frequently used as a supplementary tool, especially for programming-related queries, debugging, and last-minute assistance before deadlines. The tool’s adaptability to students’ needs, combined with its ease of use, enhances its perceived value in supporting independent learning. However, the limitations of the free version—such as restricted access, slower response times, and occasional inaccuracies—were frequently cited as barriers to consistent, effective use. Teachers acknowledged ChatGPT’s role in easing instructional burdens but emphasized the need for critical oversight to prevent over-reliance on AI-generated content. Ethical concerns regarding data privacy, academic integrity, and the quality of AI feedback were highlighted as key issues requiring attention. Interestingly, a significant portion of students expressed the belief that AI, including ChatGPT, could potentially replace human programmers in the near future, reflecting both optimism and concern about the evolving role of AI in the field. Despite this, educators maintained that while ChatGPT can augment programming education, human intuition, creativity, and contextual understanding remain irreplaceable. The study concludes that ChatGPT’s integration into SLA offers substantial opportunities to enhance educational support and enrich data on student learning behaviors. However, addressing accessibility issues, enhancing multilingual support, and mitigating ethical challenges are critical for maximizing the tool’s effectiveness. The findings underscore the importance of a balanced approach that leverages AI’s strengths while maintaining the essential role of human expertise in education and programming.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:648-661:id:1729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.