IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i5p1400-1412id1843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User experience testing methods: Conclusions from the literature

Author

Listed:
  • László Koloszár
  • Éva Bednárik
  • Ferenc Erdős
  • Rajermani Thinakaran
  • Alexandra Takáts

Abstract

Industry 4.0 focuses on the digitalization of production processes and technological innovation. The concept of Industry 5.0 puts the focus on human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience at the heart of research and development and innovation (R&D&I) processes to allow industry to serve humanity with a long-term vision that considers planetary boundaries. Replacing the technology-driven approach with a fundamentally human-centric approach requires a deep understanding of the working environment and workers interacting with machines to optimize worker well-being, working conditions, and job outcomes. Analyzing computer work User eXperience (UX) in industrial environments is vital. However, user perceptions are usually hidden and a challenge to detect. Therefore, measuring and monitoring perceptions, emotional reactions, subjective elements, preferences, and attitudes in the relationships between usability, work performance, and workload is crucial. This study provides conclusions of a literature review on user experience studies focusing on UX testing methods and the disciplines linked to industrial diversification. Based on literature analysis, it identifies UX testing methods and create own grouping to analyze them. It also examines the disciplinary context of user experience testing.

Suggested Citation

  • László Koloszár & Éva Bednárik & Ferenc Erdős & Rajermani Thinakaran & Alexandra Takáts, 2024. "User experience testing methods: Conclusions from the literature," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(5), pages 1400-1412.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:1400-1412:id:1843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/1843/675
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:1400-1412:id:1843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.