IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i4p1937-1955id1568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal power density estimation in Sub-Saharan Africa regions based on Weibull distribution parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Agbassou Guenoukpati
  • Akuété Pierre
  • Komi Amoussou
  • Adekunlé Akim
  • Seydou Ouedraogo

Abstract

The production of wind energy requires knowledge of certain wind speeds and directions. Several tools are used for this purpose to characterize the wind power, including the Weibull distribution function with two parameters, shape factor k, and the scale factor c. In this paper six methods Graphical Method (GP), Empirical Method of Justus (EMJ), Empirical Method of Lysen (EML), Energy Pattern Factor (EPF), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Moroccan Method (MMa) are used to estimate Weibull distribution parameters to evaluate the wind potential an its power density. Twelve sites in West African sub-region such as Abuja, Accra Kotoka, Bamako Senou, Conakry Gbessia, Cotonou Cadjehoun, Kano Mallam Aminu, Lagos Ikeja, Lome Tokoin, Niamey, Niamtougou, Ouagadougou, Tambacounda were selected as case studies. For each selected site, hourly wind speed data collected at 10 m height for the twelve years from January 2011 to December 2023 are used. The evaluations of each method were carried out every month and statistical criteria to provide a more complete analysis. The results show that the EPF, EMJ, EML, and ML provide highly desirable better performance while the GP and MMa showed poor performance for all stations. For all sites, the EPF was recognized as the most appropriate method except for the Lagos site where the EMJ ranks first on the others. The methods that ranked second after EPF varied among the sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Agbassou Guenoukpati & Akuété Pierre & Komi Amoussou & Adekunlé Akim & Seydou Ouedraogo, 2024. "Optimal power density estimation in Sub-Saharan Africa regions based on Weibull distribution parameters," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(4), pages 1937-1955.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1937-1955:id:1568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/1568/516
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1937-1955:id:1568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.