IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v19y2020i2p166-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Capacity Indicators as a Tool for Evaluation of Energy Projects Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • А.P. Karaeva
  • E.R. Magaril

Abstract

Today, improving the efficiency of the use of natural resources and conducting eco-modernization of energy facilities in order to reduce the negative impact on the environment is among the top priorities for the development of the energy industry at the world level. Solving these strategic tasks is impossible without significant investment activity: the influx of investments in the industry contributes to the rapid and effective implementation of projects and the development of the industry as a whole. Most of the existing methodologies for assessing the effectiveness of investment projects do not include comprehensive analysis of environmental aspects, thus creating environmental risks for the implementation of projects and the operation of energy facilities in the future. In addition, existing methods do not allow one to assess the rationality of the use of the whole mix of natural resources by an energy facility, which can lead to significant damage to natural capital. Energy facilities are the largest consumers of fuel and water resources, and as a result, the energy industry is one of the largest suppliers of industrial waste to the environment. Modern projects for eco-modernization of energy facilities are aimed at reducing resource consumption and the emission of harmful substances and industrial waste into the environment. Therefore, the urgent task is to formulate an approach to assessing the effectiveness of projects in the energy sector, taking into account the natural resources and environmental aspects. The aim of the study is to develop a system of indicators to assess the effectiveness of the use of natural resources in the implementation of investment projects in the energy sector. A system of indicators of the energy use intensity of energy production developed by the authors is presented, including indicators of resource intensity and waste intensity of energy production. The resource intensity indicator is represented by a particular indicator of fuel capacity, which can be calculated for several types of fuel consumed by an energy facility, and indicator of water use capacity of energy production. The proposed indicators allow us to access the rationality of the use of natural resources during the operation of an energy facility using traditional hydrocarbon fuels, as well as to conduct a comparative analysis of alternative projects in order to choose the best one. The results of testing the developed indicators at the regional energy facility are presented

Suggested Citation

  • А.P. Karaeva & E.R. Magaril, 2020. "Environmental Capacity Indicators as a Tool for Evaluation of Energy Projects Efficiency," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(2), pages 166-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:166-179
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.2.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2020/03_Karaeva_Magaril.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.2.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Lazar Gitelman & Elena Magaril & Romen Magaril & Alexandra Aristova, 2017. "Risk Reduction Methods for Managing the Development of Regional Electric Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Lazar Gitelman & Elena Magaril & Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Elena Cristina Rada, 2019. "Rational Behavior of an Enterprise in the Energy Market in a Circular Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gennadiy Stroykov & Alexey Y. Cherepovitsyn & Elizaveta A. Iamshchikova, 2020. "Powering Multiple Gas Condensate Wells in Russia’s Arctic: Power Supply Systems Based on Renewable Energy Sources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Mihail Busu, 2020. "A Market Concentration Analysis of the Biomass Sector in Romania," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Lazar Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Yana Visotskaya, 2023. "Diversification as a Method of Ensuring the Sustainability of Energy Supply within the Energy Transition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2019. "Promoting the Circular Economy via Waste-to-Power (WTP) in Taiwan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, May.
    5. José Rafael Lopes & Salvador Ávila & Ricardo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez, 2018. "Energy Efficiency Improvement in Non-Intensive Energy Enterprises: A Framework Proposal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    energy sector; investment projects; environmental and economic efficiency assessment; environmental and natural resource management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:166-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.