IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/manmar/vviiiy2010i2p343-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasoning Disparities Between Hk And Us Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Isola OLUWABUSUYI

    (Brown Mackie College, Atlanta, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the factors that influence intuition as a decision-making tool for leaders/managers in Hong Kong and in the United States. This study examined the relationships among gender, management level, extent of management experience, country of operation, and the reported use of intuition in decision making. Existing empirical research in this field is sparse. In this research, attempt was made to contribute to empirical research on the viability and reported use of intuition as a decision-making skill of leaders. Agor’s Intuitive Measurement Survey (AIM) survey was adapted (with permission from copyright owner) from Weston Agor’s study to measure the relationship between a manager’s reported use of intuition in decision making and the manager’s management level, his level of management experience, the manager’s gender, and the manager’s country of operation. Each participant was electronically sent a link that led to a web page containing the survey questions. Once the respondent clicks submit, the questionnaire was mailed directly to the researcher. The research shows significant relationship between research variables. Administrative managers in Hong Kong’s reported use of intuition in decision making was significantly lower than US managers reported use of intuition in decision making. The paper concludes by examining the implications of these significant findings to global business management and management education.

Suggested Citation

  • Isola OLUWABUSUYI, 2010. "Reasoning Disparities Between Hk And Us Managers," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 343-351, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:viii:y:2010:i:2:p:343-351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/17_American%20FFF.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    comparative management; management styles;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:viii:y:2010:i:2:p:343-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Barbu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.