IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/aucsse/v2y2014i42p51-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Trends In Corporate Governance Of Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Cosmin Sandu Badele

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Daniela Fundeanu

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

Abstract

In Romania, rebuilding the system of corporate governance has been a major component of the reform, although its awareness developed gradually and relatively late, driven on one hand by the accumulation of evidence of inefficiency of the system of corporate governance of state-owned enterprises, and on the other hand by the increased activism of shareholders. Corporate management is a multi-tiered approach on the relationships between interest groups (employees, managers, shareholders, business partners, regulatory bodies, the general public and the media). Thus corporate governance includes relationships which are established between the Board of Directors and internal or external stakeholders. Corporate governance has its origins in the corporation bankruptcy laws and mechanisms from each country and in the mechanisms of judicial sanction, which set the basic rules of the internal relationships between various participants in a corporation. The concept of governance (corporate) has been used in national institutions, commercial organizations, but also in the administration of the colonies and occupied territories. Subsequently, the concept of corporate governance has been developed in the private sector and was picked up and applied in most areas of activity. In recent years it has expanded rapidly, especially in the public sector. The term corporate leadership appeared in common parlance in the 1970 in the United States of America in the midst of the Watergate scandal when it was discovered the American companies involvement in politics through contributions to various political parties. The importance of this study is based on a correct approach that can lead to a managerial and organizational system with immediate, positive impact. Therefore it can offer the chance of bringing together the interests of all parties in order to lead a company to an uptrend. Good corporate governance adds value to listed entities and contributes to reducing the cost of capital, thus assuring an effective financing of the tenderers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosmin Sandu Badele & Daniela Fundeanu, 2014. "New Trends In Corporate Governance Of Public Sector," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(42), pages 51-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:2:y:2014:i:42:p:51-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feaa.ucv.ro/AUCSSE/0042v2-007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Giavazzi & Marco Battaglini, "undated". "Should we trust banks when they sit on the board of directors?," Working Papers 117, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    2. Chilosi, Alberto & Damiani, Mirella, 2007. "Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance," MPRA Paper 2334, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Boyer, Tristan, 2002. "Gouvernement d'entreprise et décisions d'emploi [Corporate Governance and employment decisions]," MPRA Paper 10287, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gilberto E. Arce & Edgar Robles C., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Costa Rica," Research Department Publications 3218, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    5. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    6. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:18-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Mohd Hassan Che Haat & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Sakthi Mahenthiran, 2008. "Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(8), pages 744-778, September.
    8. Natalya Zelenyuk & Robert Faff & Shams Pathan, 2021. "The impact of voluntary capital adequacy disclosure on bank lending and liquidity creation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3915-3935, September.
    9. Theodore E. Christensen & Hang Pei & Spencer R. Pierce & Liang Tan, 2019. "Non-GAAP reporting following debt covenant violations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 629-664, June.
    10. Boubakri, Narjess & Ghouma, Hatem, 2010. "Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2481-2499, October.
    11. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Jacob, Marcus, 2010. "Culture, agency costs, and dividends," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-339, September.
    12. Abdul Aziz, Ahmad Faizal, 2012. "Shariah Governance: Challenges Ahead," MPRA Paper 47772, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Zhang, Shengling & Wu, Zihao & He, Yinan & Hao, Yu, 2022. "How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. A. A. Drakos & F. V. Bekiris, 2010. "Endogeneity and the relationship between board structure and firm performance: a simultaneous equation analysis for the Athens Stock Exchange," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 387-401.
    15. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Al-Akra, Mahmoud & Hutchinson, Patrick, 2013. "Family firm disclosure and accounting regulation reform in the Middle East: The case of Jordan," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 101-107.
    17. Ghabri Yosra & Olfa Ben Ouda Sioud, 2011. "Ultimate ownership structure and stock liquidity: empirical evidence from Tunisia," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(4), pages 282-300, October.
    18. Ely, David P. & Song, Moon H., 2000. "Acquisition activity of large depository institutions in the 1990s:: An empirical analysis of motives," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 467-484.
    19. Ho, Sin-Yu & Njindan Iyke, Bernard, 2018. "Short- and Long-term Impact of Trade Openness on Financial Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 84272, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Naser-Abdelkareem & Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2016. "The Impact of Compliance with Codes of Corporate Governance on Quality of Disclosure: Comparative Study between Palestine and Jordan," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 215-225, September.
    21. Ichiro Iwasaki & Satoshi Mizobata & Alexander Muravyev, 2018. "Ownership dynamics and firm performance in an emerging economy: a meta-analysis of the Russian literature," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 290-333, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Governance; public institutions; national economy; public domain; interested parties financial or non-financial;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:2:y:2014:i:42:p:51-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anca Bandoi The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anca Bandoi to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.