IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/aucsse/v1y2017i45p95-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Equality Or Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Ekrem TufanAuthor-Workplace-Name: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale School of Applied Sciences, Çanakkale, Turkey

Abstract

From the beginning of economic life, equality has been a matter for human. Intrinsically human has two legs: Selfish and Groupish. Our selfish side does not care equality while Groupish side cares. What about the justice? Does human wants justice more than equalities in economic life? In this research, we have applied a questionnaire to find these two questions answer. As a result we can report that respondents prefer equality rather than justice in negative outcomes. On the other hand, they tend to prefer justice if there is possibility for positive outcomes. We cannot give evidence about gender, education and age differences effect on equality and justice preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekrem TufanAuthor-Workplace-Name: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale School of Applied Sciences, Çanakkale, Turkey, 2017. "Economic Equality Or Justice," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(45), pages 95-102, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2017:i:45:p:95-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v1_2017/0045v1-008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akitoby Bernardin & Honda Jiro & Miyamoto Hiroaki, 2022. "Countercyclical fiscal policy and gender employment: evidence from the G-7 countries," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Boarini, Romina & Causa, Orsetta & Fleurbaey, Marc & Grimalda, Gianluca & Woolard, Ingrid, 2018. "Reducing inequalities and strengthening social cohesion through inclusive growth: A roadmap for action," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-26.
    3. McGinnity, Frances & Privalko, Ivan & Fahey, Éamonn & O'Brien, Doireann & Enright, Shannen, 2020. "Origin and integration: a study of migrants in the 2016 Irish Census," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT392.
    4. Fahey, Éamonn & McGinnity, Frances & Quinn, Emma, 2019. "Data for monitoring integration: Gaps, challenges and opportunities," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT373.
    5. Gordon Anderson & Maria Grazia Pittau & Roberto Zelli, 2020. "Measuring the progress of equality of educational opportunity in absence of cardinal comparability," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(2), pages 155-174, August.
    6. Borooah, Vani, 2021. "Domestic Violence: Emotional and Physical Abuse of Wives in India," MPRA Paper 112989, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Fahey, Éamonn & Russell, Helen & McGinnity, Frances & Grotti, Raffaele, 2019. "Diverse neighbourhoods: an analysis of the residential distribution of immigrants in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT376.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Behavioural Economics; Evaluation; Economic equality; Economic fairness.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2017:i:45:p:95-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anca Bandoi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.