IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/aucsse/v1y2015i43p267-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamism Of International Trade System- Present And Future

Author

Listed:
  • Luiza Loredana Nastase

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

Abstract

This paper presents the current and future situation to international trade. Thus, regardless of the level at which these are achieved (national, regional or international), observed that increasing the number of parties involved is directly proportional to the number of issues arising. The value of world merchandise exports in 2013 was 18,800 billion dollars and the services of 4,600 billion (an increase of 6%). In the case of imports, they represented 18.4 trillion dollars for goods and 4.3 trillion dollars for commercial services. According to World Bank forecasts, the global economy is projected to grow by 3 percent in 2015, 3.3 percent in 2016 and 3.2 percent in 2017. These forecasts are quite changeable taking into account political tensions, financial stability, decline in oil prices and so on.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiza Loredana Nastase, 2015. "Dynamism Of International Trade System- Present And Future," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(43), pages 267-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2015:i:43:p:267-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feaa.ucv.ro/AUCSSE/0043v1-027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pravin Krishna, 2013. "Preferential Trade Agreements and the World Trade System: A Multilateralist View," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 131-160, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Jain, 2021. "Was India Right in Not Joining RCEP? A Cost–Benefit Analysis," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 77(4), pages 542-559, December.
    2. Bureau, Christophe & Guimbard, Houssein & Jean, Sebastien, 2016. "What Has Been Left to Multilateralism to Negotiate On?," Conference papers 332753, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Panagariya, Arvind, 2013. "Challenges to the multilateral trading system and possible responses," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-25.
    4. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Houssein Guimbard & Sébastien Jean, 2016. "Competing Liberalizations: Tariffs and Trade in the 21st Century," CESifo Working Paper Series 5962, CESifo.
    5. Jayjit Roy, 2014. "On the robustness of the trade-inducing effects of trade agreements and currency unions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 253-304, August.
    6. Robert Warner & Marlon Anatol, 2015. "Caribbean Integration—Lessons for the Pacific?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 183-196, January.
    7. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Houssein Guimbard & Sébastien Jean, 2019. "Competing liberalizations: tariffs and trade in the twenty-first century," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(4), pages 707-753, November.
    8. Wesley Morgan, 2014. "Trade Negotiations and Regional Economic Integration in the Pacific Islands Forum," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 325-336, May.
    9. Jaime DE MELO & Marcelo OLARREAGA, 2017. "Trade Related Institutions and Development," Working Papers P199, FERDI.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    international trade system; globalization; integration; multilateralism; trade in goods; trade in services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2015:i:43:p:267-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anca Bandoi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.