IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/journl/y2006v13p373-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criterii de alegere a unei metode de sondaj in cercetarea statistica

Author

Listed:
  • Danut Vasile Jemna

    (The Department of Economics, Quantitative Analysis and Business Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University)

Abstract

In the practice of statistical researches no one method of sampling is the best. But, to plan a statistical research, demand a selecting process for a sampling method from a set of possibilities. To obtain the most appropriate method of sampling concerns to use a set of selection criteria. The aim of this paper is to present such a set and to emphasis some issues concerning the selection process of a sampling method using the specificity of each criterion. We start to point up that a first set of criteria is indicating by the limits of the possibilities of statistical knowledge. Another sources of limits for selecting a sampling method are the economic restrictions and the time to achieve the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Danut Vasile Jemna, 2006. "Criterii de alegere a unei metode de sondaj in cercetarea statistica," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 52, pages 373-379, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2006:v:13:p:373-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/resurse/56_Jemna_DV_-_Criterii_de_alegere_a_unei_metode_de_sondaj_in_cercetarea_statistica.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/en/Arhiva%202006%20-%20Jemna/197
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2006:v:13:p:373-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.