IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/jopafl/y2015v8p87-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property Rights, Externalities And Sustainable Development. A Case Study On Central And Eastern European Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Iolanda VODA

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Department of Interdisciplinary Research � Humanities and Social Sciences, yolandadr3i@yahoo.com, Iasi, Romania,)

  • Claudiu TIGANAS

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, clau_tiganas@yahoo.com, Iasi, Romania,)

Abstract

The present paper is aimed to put emphasis on the fact that the role and importance of healthy institutional order in achieving sustainable development is essential. The whole environment theoretical movement follows the same development trend and theoretical and doctrinary evolution. Nevertheless, the market as a real, tangible product of the standard economic judgement system bears imperfections, i.e. income distribution, transaction costs or negative externalities. We therefore aim to bring strong arguments to demonstrate that, irrespective of the ideological level we take into account, we can not refer to market in the absence of private property. Other formal and informal institutions must participate in the whole process in order to enable it to function within optimum parameters. The whole CEE countries� analysis illustrates that protecting and respecting property rights is of paramount importance in maintaining a high level of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Iolanda VODA & Claudiu TIGANAS, 2015. "Property Rights, Externalities And Sustainable Development. A Case Study On Central And Eastern European Member States," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 8(8), pages 87-95, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2015:v:8:p:87-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue8/PROPERTY_RIGHTS_EXTERNALITIES_AND_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_A_CASE_STUDY_ON_CEE_COUNTRIES.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiriac Cãtãlin & Vodã Ana-Iolanda & Constantinescu Radu, 2012. "The Limitations of Standard Economical Theory from the Perspective of Development, Sustainability and Rationality in Resource Allocation," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 442-447, May.
    2. Partha Dasgupta, 2011. "The Ethics of Intergenerational Distribution: Reply and Response to John E. Roemer," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(4), pages 475-493, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Therese Grijalva & Jayson Lusk & W. Shaw, 2014. "Discounting the Distant Future: An Experimental Investigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(1), pages 39-63, September.
    2. John Roemer, 2013. "Once More on Intergenerational Discounting in Climate-Change Analysis: Reply to Partha Dasgupta," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 141-148, September.
    3. Constantinescu, Radu, 2012. "Repere ale raţionalităţii limitate în ştiinţa economică [Highlights of bounded rationality in economics]," MPRA Paper 44297, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Feb 2013.
    4. Endress, Lee H. & Pongkijvorasin, Sittidaj & Roumasset, James & Wada, Christopher A., 2014. "Intergenerational equity with individual impatience in a model of optimal and sustainable growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 620-635.
    5. Stern, Nicholas, 2014. "Ethics, equity and the economics of climate change paper 2: economics and politics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Geir B. Asheim, 2017. "Sustainable growth," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 825-848, December.
    7. Athanasoglou, Stergios & Bosetti, Valentina & Drouet, Laurent, 2017. "A Simple Framework for Climate-Change Policy under Model Uncertainty," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 254043, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    8. repec:lsg:lsgwps:wp84 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Schymura, Michael, 2012. "Expected utility theory and the tyranny of catastrophic risks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 234-239.
    10. W. Botzen & Jeroen Bergh, 2014. "Specifications of Social Welfare in Economic Studies of Climate Policy: Overview of Criteria and Related Policy Insights," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 58(1), pages 1-33, May.
    11. Lee H. Endress & Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin & James Roumasset & Christopher Wada, 2013. "Intergenerational Equity with Individual Impatience in an OLG Model of Optimal and Sustainable Growth," Working Papers 2013-9, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    12. Skott, Peter & Davis, Leila, 2013. "Distributional biases in the analysis of climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 188-197.
    13. Nicholas Stern, 2013. "Ethics, equity and the economics of climate change. Paper 2: Economics and Politics," GRI Working Papers 84b, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    14. Michael Spackman, 2011. "Government discounting controversies: the valuation of social time preference," GRI Working Papers 68, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2015:v:8:p:87-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.