IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/jopafl/y2013v3p91-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Trends In The Approach Of The Credit Relationships Between Banks And Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan Constantin VORONEANU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, bvoroneanu@yahoo.com, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The relationship between bank (as lender) - company (as debtor) observed as an ensemble of processes and information flows, has always been a favourite subject of study and analysis of both economics and specialty practice, emphasizing a constant concern for improvement considering its importance for the quality of economic and social life of a nation. The management of the lending activity at the banks level has many common features at the company level. In both types of organizations is required the implementation of a decision-making system to guide about the following aspects: the maximum amount of credit that may be granted, the type of credit and the maximum amount which should be granted considering the credit risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan Constantin VORONEANU, 2013. "Current Trends In The Approach Of The Credit Relationships Between Banks And Companies," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 3(3), pages 91-97, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2013:v:3:p:91-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue3/CURRENT_TRENDS_IN_THE_APPROACH_OF_THE_CREDIT_RELATIONSHIPS_BETWEEN_BANKS_AND_COMPANIES.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. B. Gorton & Ping He, 2008. "Bank Credit Cycles," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(4), pages 1181-1214.
    2. Mihaela Onofrei & Dan Lupu, 2012. "The Management of Economic Decline and the Dimension of Organizational Change," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 470-484, June.
    3. Hirofumi Uchida & Gregory F. Udell & Wako Watanabe, 2008. "Bank Size and Lending Relationships in Japan," NBER Chapters, in: Organizational Innovation and Firm Performance, pages 242-267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. David Carter & James McNulty & James Verbrugge, 2004. "Do Small Banks have an Advantage in Lending? An Examination of Risk-Adjusted Yields on Business Loans at Large and Small Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 233-252, April.
    5. Hirofumi Uchida & Gregory F. Udell & Nobuyoshi Yamori, 2006. "Loan Officers and Relationship Lending," Discussion papers 06031, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Lehmann, Erik & Neuberger, Doris, 1998. "SME Loan Pricing and Lending Relationships in Germany: A New Look," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 18, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    7. Fight, Andrew, 2004. "Credit Risk Management," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780750659031.
    8. C. Gourieroux & A. Monfort & V. Polimenis, 2006. "Affine Models for Credit Risk Analysis," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 494-530.
    9. Elyasiani, Elyas & Goldberg, Lawrence G., 2004. "Relationship lending: a survey of the literature," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 315-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietro Alessandrini & Andrea F. Presbitero & Alberto Zazzaro, 2010. "Bank size or distance: what hampers innovation adoption by SMEs?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(6), pages 845-881, November.
    2. Uchida, Hirofumi & Udell, Gregory F. & Watanabe, Wako, 2008. "Bank size and lending relationships in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 242-267, June.
    3. Gregory F Udell, 2015. "SME Access to Intermediated Credit: What Do We Know and What Don't We Know?," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Angus Moore & John Simon (ed.),Small Business Conditions and Finance, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    4. Kitamura, Tomiyuki & Muto, Ichiro & Takei, Ikuo, 2016. "Loan interest rate pass-through and changes after the financial crisis: Japan’s evidence," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 10-30.
    5. Wei Yin & Kent Matthews, 2018. "Why Do Firms Switch Banks? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2040-2052, July.
    6. Diana Bonfim & Qinglei Dai, 2017. "Bank Size and Lending Specialisation," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 46(2), pages 329-380, July.
    7. Doris Neuberger & Solvig Räthke, 2009. "Microenterprises and multiple bank relationships: The case of professionals," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 207-229, February.
    8. Mkhaiber, Achraf & Werner, Richard A., 2021. "The relationship between bank size and the propensity to lend to small firms: New empirical evidence from a large sample," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Ferri, Giovanni & Murro, Pierluigi, 2015. "Do firm–bank ‘odd couples’ exacerbate credit rationing?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 231-251.
    10. Atul Teckchandani, 2016. "Bank Ownership and Lending Behaviours: The Relevance of Community Links," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 168-174, June.
    11. Kano, Masaji & Uchida, Hirofumi & Udell, Gregory F. & Watanabe, Wako, 2011. "Information verifiability, bank organization, bank competition and bank-borrower relationships," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 935-954, April.
    12. Neuberger, Doris & Räthke, Solvig, 2006. "Microenterprises and multiple bank relationships: Evidence from a survey among professionals," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 61, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    13. Oh, Joon-Hee & Johnston, Wesley J., 2014. "Credit lender–borrower relationship in the credit card market – Implications for credit risk management strategy and relationship marketing," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1086-1095.
    14. Wei Yin & Kent Matthews, 2017. "Single Versus Multiple Banking Relationships-Evidence From Chinese Lending Market," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(01), pages 227-250, March.
    15. Tadanori Yosano & Takayoshi Nakaoka, 2011. "The Roles of Relationship Lending and Utilization of Soft Information on Bank Performance in Competitive Local Markets," Discussion Papers 2011-41, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    16. Akhigbe, Aigbe & McNulty, James E., 2011. "Bank monitoring, profit efficiency and the commercial lending business model," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 531-551.
    17. Sahar Loukil & Anis Jarboui, 2016. "Empirical determinants of relationship lending," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1163773-116, December.
    18. Douglas Sutherland & Peter Hoeller & Balázs Égert & Oliver Röhn, 2010. "Counter-cyclical Economic Policy," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 760, OECD Publishing.
    19. Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Antoine Patin, 2018. "Loss functions for LGD model comparison," Working Papers halshs-01516147, HAL.
    20. Kirschenmann, K., 2010. "The Dynamics in Requested and Granted Loan Terms when Bank and Borrower Interact Repeatedly," Other publications TiSEM 40d5005c-1626-4511-aa8a-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2013:v:3:p:91-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.