IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahc/journl/y2024id1970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of modern methods for calculating product costs

Author

Listed:
  • N. S. Andruk
  • E. A. Naumova

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of methods for calculating the cost of production at an industrial enterprise. It is noted that when choosing the appropriate calculation method, along with general principles, one should take into account the specifics of the production and economic activities of each specific enterprise. For this purpose, both well–known and well–proven calculation methods, as well as modern ones used in international practice, such as «target costing» and «kaizen costing» are considered. A comparative analysis of the considered traditional and modern methods, systematized in tabular form, is provided. The advantages, disadvantages, and possible results of using each method are noted. A description of these methods is provided. Using the example of a shipbuilding enterprise, directions for improving the applied calculation methods by using the advantages of the considered methods are substantiated.

Suggested Citation

  • N. S. Andruk & E. A. Naumova, 2024. "Comparative analysis of modern methods for calculating product costs," Entrepreneur’s Guide, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 17(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2024:id:1970
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2023-17-3-62-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1970/1727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-17-3-62-69?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2024:id:1970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.