IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic And Socio-Environmental Evaluation Of Predator Control Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Gum, Russell L.
  • Martin, William E.

Abstract

A simulation model containing both economic (monetary) and socio-environmental (value index) components is developed in a case study of predator control alternatives. Particular emphasis is given to the description and justification of the socio-economic model. The economic model is estimated in terms of producers' and consumers' surpluses. The empirical tradeoff function developed suggests that alternatives to recent predator control programs exist that could be "better" for both general public and producer interests. The general approach can serve as a prototype for policy evaluations involving multiple objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Gum, Russell L. & Martin, William E., 1979. "Economic And Socio-Environmental Evaluation Of Predator Control Alternatives," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32435
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32435/files/04010033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gee, C. Kerry, 1977. "Enterprise Budgets for Western Commercial Sheep Businesses, 1974," Miscellaneous Publications 330111, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Gum, Russell L. & Arthur, Louise M. & Magleby, Richard S., 1978. "Coyote Control: A Simulation of Evaluation of Alternative Strategies," Agricultural Economic Reports 307686, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Gee, C. Kerry & Magleby, Richard S. & Bailey, Warren R. & Gum, Russell L. & Arthur, Louise M., 1977. "Sheep and Lamb Losses to Predators and Other Causes in the Western United States," Agricultural Economic Reports 307647, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Schmalensee, Richard, 1976. "Another Look at the Social Valuation of Input Price Changes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 239-243, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harrison, Virden L., 1980. "Sheep Production: Intensive Systems, Innovative Techniques Boost Yields," Agricultural Economic Reports 307881, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Erin T. Mansur, 2011. "Upstream versus Downstream Implementation of Climate Policy," NBER Chapters, in: The Design and Implementation of US Climate Policy, pages 179-193, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Louise Arthur, 1978. "Quantifying socio-environmental impacts of predator control policies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 235-244, March.
    4. Robert Albon, 1998. "The Efficiency Effects of Removing the Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(225), pages 145-152, June.
    5. Gum, Russell L. & Arthur, Louise M. & Magleby, Richard S., 1978. "Coyote Control: A Simulation of Evaluation of Alternative Strategies," Agricultural Economic Reports 307686, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Rouwendal Jan, 2012. "Indirect Effects in Cost-Benefit Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Fernandez, Ignacio del Rosal, 2000. "How costly is the maintenance of the coal-mining jobs in Europe? The Spanish case 1989-1995," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 537-547, July.
    9. Leonardo J. Basso, 2013. "On input market surplus and its relation to the downstream market game," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 266-281, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.