IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Distribution Of Tax Burdens And Government Expenditure Benefits In Metro And Nonmetro Arizona

Author

Listed:
  • Hoyt, Paul G.
  • Ayer, Harry W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoyt, Paul G. & Ayer, Harry W., 1977. "The Distribution Of Tax Burdens And Government Expenditure Benefits In Metro And Nonmetro Arizona," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-4, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32212
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32212/files/01010238.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. C. Buse, 1973. "Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(3), pages 503-508.
    2. Maital, Shlomo, 1973. "Public Goods and Income Distribution: Some Further Results," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 561-568, May.
    3. Aaron, Henry & McGuire, Martin, 1970. "Public Goods and Income Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(6), pages 907-920, November.
    4. McGuire, Martin C & Aaron, Henry J, 1969. "Efficiency and Equity in the Optimal Supply of a Public Good," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(1), pages 31-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marousek, Gerald, 1978. "Costs And Benefits Of Public Programs To Back-To-The -Land And Conventional Rural Households," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Kinnucan, Henry & Duffy, Patricia A., 1987. "The Farm Tax Burden: 1979 Versus 1983 With Regional Comparisons," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270121, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eskeland, Gunnar*Chingying Kong, 1998. "Protecting the environment and the poor - a public goods framework applied to Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1961, The World Bank.
    2. Richard D. Raymond & Michael Sesnowitz, 1980. "The Distributional Impact of Public Goods," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(4), pages 397-426, October.
    3. Hines Jr., James R., 2000. "What is benefit taxation?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 483-492, March.
    4. Haizhen Mou & Stanley L. Winer, 2015. "Fiscal Incidence When Family Structure Matters," Public Finance Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 373-401, May.
    5. Kaplow, Louis, 2006. "Public goods and the distribution of income," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1627-1660, October.
    6. Udo Ebert, 2003. "Environmental Goods and the Distribution of Income," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(4), pages 435-459, August.
    7. Bengt-Arne Wickström, 1986. "Transfers, collective goods, and redistribution," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 243-258, December.
    8. Martin David, 1975. "Measurement of the Cost of Living Including the Public Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 4, number 1, pages 133-152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Richard A. Musgrave & Karl E. Case & Herman Leonard, 1974. "The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits," Public Finance Review, , vol. 2(3), pages 259-311, July.
    10. Ayer, Harry W. & Weidman, Joe, 1976. "The Rural Town As A Producing Unit: An Empirical Analysis And Implications For Rural Development Policy," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Arthur J. Mann, 1976. "The Fiscal System and Income Distribution: The Case of Puerto Rico," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(3), pages 339-366, July.
    12. Geoffrey Philpotts, 1986. "Public Good Benefit Attribution," Public Finance Review, , vol. 14(3), pages 313-328, July.
    13. Udo Ebert & Georg Tillmann, 2006. "Budget Incidence Reconsidered," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Gians. S. Sahota, 1977. "The Distribution of the Benefits of Public Expenditure in Panama," Public Finance Review, , vol. 5(2), pages 203-230, April.
    15. Eugene Smolensky & Leanna Stiefel & Maria Schmundt, 1977. "Adding In-Kind Transfers to the Personal Income and Outlay Account: Implications for the Size Distribution of Income," NBER Chapters, in: The Distribution of Economic Well-Being, pages 9-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. José Ignacio Gobernado Rebaque, 2003. "Un análisis de incidencia fiscal municipal: Efectos redistributivos de los presupuestos de los ayuntamientos de Castilla y León," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 166(3), pages 85-111, September.
    17. Cormac O'Dea & Ian Preston, 2012. "The distributional impact of public spending in the UK," IFS Working Papers W12/06, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Peter J. Lambert & Wilhelm Pfähler, 1988. "On Aggregate Measures of the Net Redistributive Impact of Taxation and Government Expenditure," Public Finance Review, , vol. 16(2), pages 178-202, April.
    19. Felipe Diniz, 2005. "Contructing A Broader Measure Of Welfare Incorporating The Access To Public Goods," Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 33rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 045, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    20. Paul Burgat & Claude Jeanrenaud, 1996. "Do Benefit and Equal Absolute Sacrifice Rules Really Lead To Different Taxation Levels?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 24(2), pages 148-162, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.