IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersja/144926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The National Food Survey of the United Kingdom and Comparisons With Other British and American Food Data

Author

Listed:
  • Burk, Marguerite C.

Abstract

The National Food Survey has been a carefully watched gauge for both wartime and postwar British food administration. It has measured the successes and the failures of the policies and programs for maintaining equitable distribution of foods essential to the civilian population of the United Kingdom during the prolonged and grim struggle, first against the enemy, then on the hard road back to some semblance of economic recovery. Because the Survey was conducted only for administrative use, its detailed findings were not published until late 1951. Although such findings were always available to key American food officials, the inner workings of the Survey have been little known on this side of the Atlantic. Accordingly, while in England for independent research at Cambridge University in 1955-56, Miss Burk prepared a report for administrative use in the Agricultural Marketing Service; this was done with the wholehearted cooperation of administrators and technical personnel who were responsible for the Survey and its interpretation. In this article we publish nonconfidential information from the report and some further research notes on these and other comparable data. Although Miss Burk is indebted to a number of civil servants of Her Majesty's Government for extended and frank discussions of problems involved in the Survey, her article represents essentially preliminary research findings. The article is not an official statement of either Her Majesty's Government or the U. S. Department of Agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Burk, Marguerite C., 1957. "The National Food Survey of the United Kingdom and Comparisons With Other British and American Food Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:144926
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.144926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/144926/files/2Burk_9_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.144926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:144926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.