Author
Abstract
Economists engaged in agricultural marketing research are frequently called on to obtain information on industrial markets for farm products, costs of advertising and packaging these products, and tax outlays by marketing agencies. Besides these essentially descriptive questions, they may also be asked to appraise such analytical problems as the effect of various farm programs on industries processing and distributing farm products and, of particular current interest, the impact of the European Common Market and of proposed foreign trade programs on American farmers and on agricultural marketing agencies. Anyone familiar with Leontief (9) 1 input-output economics will readily see that these descriptive and analytical questions—and a host of similar ones—can be organized and studied within the interindustry framework. A review of the literature indicates that agricultural economists have used input output analysis extensively in production and regional research (7, 10), but its application to agricultural marketing problems has hardly been explored. The main purposes of this paper are (1) to illustrate a few of the more obvious applications of inpu toutput research to problems in agricultural marketing, and (2) to present a recent special aggregation of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Interindustry Study for 1947 (5) which can serve as a benchmark for future work in this area.3 The aggregation highlights farm sectors and agricultural marketing sectors detailed in the Bureau of Labor Statistics approximately 500-sector model. Description of the tables is limited to the essentials needed for an understanding of the suggested applications. The mathematics underlying the analysis appears in a technical appendix (pages 99-101). The author expresses his appreciation to Allen Paul and Frank deLeeuw for their helpful comments.
Suggested Citation
Waldorf, William H., 1962.
"Input-Output Analysis as a Tool in Agricultural Marketing Research,"
Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uersja:140837
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.140837
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:140837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.