IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/30425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use Of Economic Analysis In The Tennessee Valley Authority: The Case Of The Duck River Project

Author

Listed:
  • Shabman, Leonard A.

Abstract

In September, 1968 the Tennessee Valley Authority recommended construction of two dams on the Duck River in middle Tennessee. Subsequently, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared which further described the plan and provided a summary of the national economic efficiency justification for its implementaion. Table 1 summarizes the EIS justification. However, the accuracy of the EIS analysis may be subject to question. This paper evaluates the sensitivity of the EIS national economic analysis to changes in expansion benefit estimates, reconsideration of cost estimates and their use, and the discount rate used for analysis. Also discussed is the consideration given to alternatives to the Duck River Project, and institutional limitations on the TVA's mission that affect the use of economic analysis.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Shabman, Leonard A., 1973. "The Use Of Economic Analysis In The Tennessee Valley Authority: The Case Of The Duck River Project," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:30425
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30425/files/05010245.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.30425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:30425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.