IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Pest Control Strategies For Cotton With An Environmental Impact Matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Richardson, James W.
  • Badger, Daniel D.

Abstract

Agricultural pesticide use has come under an intensive attack from an environmentally aware society. The Environmental Protection Agency has placed restrictions on use of selected pesticides, including DDT. The use of pesticide is a paradox in itself. Without feasible alternative insecticide strategies, such as biological control, restrictions on the use of pesticides will decrease agricultural output and food costs will increase. However, with pesticide use, social costs in the form of environmental damages may occur. To make an equitable decision as to the future of pesticides, researchers and policy-makers have tried to determine the optimal level of use, optimal timing of application, extent of economic benefits, extent of social costs, and the effects on the economy of pesticide restrictions.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Richardson, James W. & Badger, Daniel D., 1974. "Analyzing Pest Control Strategies For Cotton With An Environmental Impact Matrix," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-5, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29825
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29825/files/06010179.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lacewell, Ronald D. & Masch, William R., 1972. "Economic Incentives to Reduce the Quantity of Chemicals Used in Commercial Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 203-208, July.
    2. Lacewell, Ronald D. & Masch, William R., 1972. "Economic Incentives To Reduce The Quantity Of Chemicals Used In Commercial Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liapis, Peter S. & Moffitt, L. Joe, 1983. "Economic Analysis Of Cotton Integrated Pest Management Strategies," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spinks, Thomas & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Inputs Used in U.S. Farm Production: A Bibliography of Selected Economic Studies, 1950-80," Economics and Statistics Services (ESS) Reports 319963, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Casey, James E. & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1973. "Estimated Impact Of Withdrawing Specified Pesticides From Cotton Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.