Author
Listed:
- Spiler, Marko
- Kvrgic, Goran
- Vujadin, Radomir
Abstract
Purchasers and bidders, in the sense of Public procurement law, represent one of the most important factors of the economic and social system as a whole. Their significance is multiple, and due to a difficult situation and the period of posteconomic crisis, the idea of necessity of a change in business operations of the participants in business environment is emphasized, especially in the public sector, in order to reduce to a minimum or completely eliminate the multiyear losses in business operations, which represent a crucial, but not the only, indicator of business success. Radical turn in the sense of business operations of the purchasers represents a risk. The more radical the strategic option, the greater the risk. However, this paper rests on the idea that the turn is not the strategy which should be applied to the purchasers and the large business systems in public sector, because by radical changes in one segment of the large system we can disturb its other parts and experience fatal consequences for the system as a whole. Instead, a situational, adaptive model is suggested, with the dominant application of incremental, „stepby- step“strategic steps, in order not to disturb the structure of the system. Also, besides the measures connected to the current business operations, in certain segments we mention the factors which are not absolutely in reach of large business systems, but they would significantly contribute to better business operations and of course to rehabilitation of losses. Everything mentioned, regardless of the level and correlations between the mentioned factors, is shown through the thematic of public procurements, through which the contracting of the largest number of businesses in public sector happens.
Suggested Citation
Spiler, Marko & Kvrgic, Goran & Vujadin, Radomir, 2016.
"Attaining the Strategic Advantage in Large Business Systems Through the Public Procurement System,"
Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 62(2), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:sereko:288848
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.288848
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sereko:288848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomika.org.rs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.