IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desenvolvimento Rural e Reconhecimento: tensões e dilemas envolvendo o Pronaf

Author

Listed:
  • Resende, Cátia Meire
  • Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins

Abstract

This article aims to investigate how Pronaf (National Program for the Strengthening of Family Farming) is defined and assessed by the Brazilian government in order to deconstruct any causal relationship between development and recognition that may exist in the information about the program. The methodology used was a review of official data on Pronaf, which directed the questions about the volume of funds available for credit, as well as on the distribution of these between groups of beneficiaries and regions in Brazil. As main results, it is highlighted that only the redistribution of resources is not sufficient for the recognition of farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Resende, Cátia Meire & Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins, 2016. "Desenvolvimento Rural e Reconhecimento: tensões e dilemas envolvendo o Pronaf," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 54(2), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341301
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341301/files/C%C3%A1tia%20Meire%20Resende.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeller, Manfred & Schiesari, Carolina, 2020. "The unequal allocation of PRONAF resources: which factors determine the intensity of the program across Brazil?," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 58(3), January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.