Author
Listed:
- de Paiva, André Luiz
- Brito, Mozar José de
Abstract
The organizational field of alembic cachaça in Minas Gerais is composed by different actors and social structures. This configuration underwent several transformations from the colonial period, marked by marginalized manufacturing and consumption, until nowadays, when the beverage has been consolidated as a symbol of the national culture. In certain segments, cachaça is included as a product of high social distinction and wide insertion in the international market. In this direction, this work aimed to describe the configuration of the institutional logics that constitute this organizational field. Initially, we sought to recover the socio-historical context of the drink through documentary sources and interviews with actors representing the organizations of the field. Next, we outlined four main logics that serve as reference for producers of alembic cachaça, namely: tradition, market, state and a technical-scientific logic. We described the main constituent elements of these logics, highlighting their assumptions and orientations in relation to symbolic and practice dimensions. Thus, it was possible to show how the institutional dynamics, especially from the emergence of technical-scientific logic, guided changes in the normative configuration of cachaça production and consumption.
Suggested Citation
de Paiva, André Luiz & Brito, Mozar José de, 2018.
"A Configuração das Lógicas Institucionais do Campo da Cachaça de Alambique em Minas Gerais,"
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 56(4), January.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:revi24:341242
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341242
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.