IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacto das Variações no Crédito Rural e no Investimento em Pesquisa Agrícola na Produtividade da Agricultura Brasileira Contemporânea

Author

Listed:
  • Costa Junior, Celso José

Abstract

The fall in productivity of the main crops may be related to the reduction of investments in research. Moreover, subsidized rural credit may be necessary for an increase in productivity, since this is a key factor for production and sectoral modernization. Realizing the relevance of these two points, this work uses a DSGE model with closed-economy, no government, and two-sector. The results indicate that low investment in research led to low productivity of the agricultural sector until 2011, which recovered in 2012 and 2013. On the other hand, subsidized rural credit presented zero results until 2009, and in 2010 and 2011, the result was positive, but became negative in 2012 and 2013. Among the two policies proposed, the rural credit subsidy presented better results than agricultural research, because the performance of the product was higher in the first case.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa Junior, Celso José, 2018. "Impacto das Variações no Crédito Rural e no Investimento em Pesquisa Agrícola na Produtividade da Agricultura Brasileira Contemporânea," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 56(4), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341229
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341229/files/Celso%20Jos%C3%A9%20Costa%20Junior.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.