IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Economic Performance of Livestock, an Environmental Input-Output Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos de Santana
  • Leão, Eder Johnson de Area
  • Freitas, Lúcio Flávio da Silva

Abstract

In the last three decades, the developing countries have sharply increased its contribution to global warming. From 2005 to 2012, Brazil has reduced its total emissions in 12% due to deforestation control. In the same period, the total GHG emissions excluding land-use change and forestry have increased 18% (WRI, 2014), while per capita GPD has raised 17%. The Brazilian climate policy must go beyond the deforestation control to avoid an unsustainable pattern of development. Since the mitigation effort bears heavily on primary activities, one must ask: how important are those sectors for Brazilian economy? And how their emissions are connected to other sectors along the productive chain? Specifically, this paper aims to calculate the GHG emissions multipliers of the Brazilian economy in 2009 and associate these results with the employment and income multipliers, particularly of the Agriculture sector. The ‘field of influence’ method (SONIS and HEWINGS, 1992) is applied to calculate the intersectorial relations in terms of input linkages and GHG emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos de Santana & Leão, Eder Johnson de Area & Freitas, Lúcio Flávio da Silva, 2018. "Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Economic Performance of Livestock, an Environmental Input-Output Analysis," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 56(2), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341200
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341200/files/Luiz%20Carlos%20de%20Santana%20Ribeiro.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W. & Low, Melissa, 2013. "Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade and the driving forces: Processing and normal exports," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 119-125.
    2. Guilhoto, J. J. M. & Sesso Filho, U. A., 2005. "Estimação da Matriz Insumo-Produto a Partir De Dados Preliminares das Contas Nacionais [Estimation of input-output matrix using preliminary data from national accounts]," MPRA Paper 38212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Brizga, Janis & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus, 2014. "Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic States: A structural decomposition analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 22-28.
    4. Costa, Cinthia Cabral da & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Imori, Denise, 2013. "Importância dos Setores Agroindustriais na Geração de Renda e Emprego para a Economia Brasileira," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 51(4), pages 1-18, December.
    5. André Perusso, 2012. "Reduction in carbon emissions in the Brazilian agricultural value chain through a decrease in transported volume," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 390-400.
    6. Hristu-Varsakelis, D. & Karagianni, S. & Pempetzoglou, M. & Sfetsos, A., 2010. "Optimizing production with energy and GHG emission constraints in Greece: An input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1566-1577, March.
    7. Marcelo Bentes Diniz & José Nilo de Oliveira Junior & Nicolino Trompieri Neto & Márcia Jucá Teixeira Diniz, 2009. "Causas do desmatamento da Amazônia: uma aplicação do teste de causalidade de Granger acerca das principais fontes de desmatamento nos municípios da Amazônia Legal brasileira [Causes of deforestation i," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 19(1), pages 121-151, January-A.
    8. Dimitrios Hristu-Varsakelis & Stella Karagianni & Maria Pempetzoglou & Athanasios Sfetsos, 2012. "Optimizing Production In The Greek Economy: Exploring The Interaction Between Greenhouse Gas Emissions And Solid Waste Via Input--Output Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 57-75, March.
    9. Mercedes Bustamante & Carlos Nobre & Roberto Smeraldi & Ana Aguiar & Luis Barioni & Laerte Ferreira & Karla Longo & Peter May & Alexandre Pinto & Jean Ometto, 2012. "Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 559-577, December.
    10. Manfred Lenzen & Roberto Schaeffer & Jonas Karstensen & Glen Peters, 2013. "Drivers of change in Brazil’s carbon dioxide emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 815-824, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kênia Barreiro de Souza & Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro & Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli, 2016. "Reducing Brazilian greenhouse gas emissions: scenario simulations of targets and policies," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 482-496, October.
    2. Majumdar, Devleena & Kar, Saibal, 2017. "Does technology diffusion help to reduce emission intensity? Evidence from organized manufacturing and agriculture in India," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 30-41.
    3. Jiang, Xuemei & Guan, Dabo, 2017. "The global CO2 emissions growth after international crisis and the role of international trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 734-746.
    4. C. Oliveira & D. Coelho & C. H. Antunes, 2016. "Coupling input–output analysis with multiobjective linear programming models for the study of economy–energy–environment–social (E3S) trade-offs: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 471-502, December.
    5. Eduardo Haddad & Juan Manuel Samaniego & Alexandre Porsse & Santiago Ochoa & Luiz Gustavo Souza, 2011. "Interregional Interdependence among Ecuadorian Provinces: An Input-Output Analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa11p836, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Amaral Haddad, Eduardo & Cotarelli, Natália & Simonato, Thiago & Vale, Vinicius & Coelho Visentin, Jaqueline, 2018. "Estimation of NUTS2 Interregional Input-Output Systems for Greece, 2010 and 2013," TD NEREUS 3-2018, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    7. Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos de Santana & Santana, José Ricardo de & Santos, Rafaela Nascimento, 2022. "The effects of oil royalties on regional inequality in Brazil," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    8. Yagi, Michiyuki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "The spillover effects of rising energy prices following 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 680-695.
    9. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W. & Li, Yingzhu, 2017. "Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore's carbon emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 484-492.
    11. Chen, Y.-H. Henry & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2012. "Economic implications of reducing carbon emissions from energy use and industrial processes in Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6135, The World Bank.
    12. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2019. "Energy-economic resilience with multi-region input–output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Song, Junnian & Yang, Wei & Higano, Yoshiro & Wang, Xian’en, 2015. "Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues: An input–output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 178-189.
    14. Bliska, Flavia M. M. & Guilhoto, Joaquim J. M. & Imori, Denise & Sakon, Fernando M. & Camargo, Fernanda S. & Vegro, Celso L. R., 2009. "Employment generation in Brazilian coffee regions," MPRA Paper 30729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Vinhais, Henrique & Guilhoto, Joaquim, 2012. "Economic Impact of the Expansion of Federal Universities in Brazil," TD NEREUS 16-2012, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    16. Boglioni, Michele & Zambelli, Stefano, 2018. "Specialization patterns and reduction of CO2 emissions. An empirical investigation of environmental preservation and economic efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-149.
    17. Yang, Ranran & Long, Ruyin & Yue, Ting & Shi, Haihong, 2014. "Calculation of embodied energy in Sino-USA trade: 1997–2011," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 110-119.
    18. Yulei Xie & Ling Ji & Beibei Zhang & Gordon Huang, 2018. "Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Piñero, Pablo & Heikkinen, Mari & Mäenpää, Ilmo & Pongrácz, Eva, 2015. "Sector aggregation bias in environmentally extended input output modeling of raw material flows in Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 217-229.
    20. Yu, Liu & Meng, Bo & Hubacek, Klaus & Xue, Jinjun & Feng, Kuishuang & Gao, Yuning, 2016. "How does firm heterogeneity information impact the estimation of embodied carbon emissions in Chinese exports?," IDE Discussion Papers 592, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.