IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diferenças regionais de tecnologia na agricultura familiar no Brasil

Author

Listed:
  • Souza, Paulo Marcelo de
  • Fornazier, Armando
  • Souza, Hadma Milaneze de
  • Ponciano, Niraldo José

Abstract

The objective of this research was to obtain, for the Brazilian family farming, a measure of the use of the main technologies. Initially, for each meso-region, 59 indicators of the use of various technologies were obtained. Through factor analysis, these indicators were synthesized in four factors, whose values were the basis for the estimative of an index of technology use. It was observed, from these indexes, large regional differences regarding the use of technology in family farming. It was found that the highest levels of technology use are concentrated in the South, but also in the Southeast of Brazil, especially in São Paulo state. In the Central-West, except for the Federal District, average levels prevail. However, in the North and Northeast, in most cases, low or very low levels of technology are predominant.

Suggested Citation

  • Souza, Paulo Marcelo de & Fornazier, Armando & Souza, Hadma Milaneze de & Ponciano, Niraldo José, 2019. "Diferenças regionais de tecnologia na agricultura familiar no Brasil," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 57(4), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341179
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341179/files/Paulo%20Marcelo%20de%20Souza.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.