IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Análise de cenários do agronegócio brasileiro frente à China, aos EUA e à UE, utilizando um modelo de equilíbrio geral computável

Author

Listed:
  • Buchmann, Jurandir Luiz
  • Massuquetti, Angélica
  • Azevedo, André Filipe Zago de

Abstract

This study aims to analyze trade opportunities by simulating a possible trade integration between Brazil and China, US and the EU. The goal is to identify the sectors most benefited by the eventual agreement, classified according to their degree of technological intensity, with emphasis on Brazilian agribusiness. We classified products by level of technological intensity according to the criteria of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We used the computable general equilibrium model and the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) database, version 9, to simulate the impacts on international trade and the welfare effects of a possible trade integration of Brazil with selected partners. Finally, the results show that welfare gains for Brazil, in all agreements, are mainly related to the better allocation of its productive resources, which would concentrate in the primary sectors, and of low technological intensity, which would add the agribusiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchmann, Jurandir Luiz & Massuquetti, Angélica & Azevedo, André Filipe Zago de, 2021. "Análise de cenários do agronegócio brasileiro frente à China, aos EUA e à UE, utilizando um modelo de equilíbrio geral computável," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 59(4), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341082
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341082/files/Jurandir%20Luiz%20Buchmann.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.