Author
Listed:
- Ibarra Flores, F.A.
- Martín Rivera, S.
- Moreno Medina, M.
- Denogean Ballesteros, F.G.
- Martinez Duran, Ana B.
- Retes López, R.
- De La Toba García, V.M.
- Aguilar Valdes, Alfredo
Abstract
Large areas of Short Grasslands in Northern Sonora, Mexico show severe problems of catclaw mimosa invasion, which limits productivity potential and interfere with grassland utilization. This study was conducted in Cananea, Sonora to evaluate several doses of tebuthiuron herbicide to control brush species and measure the effects in forage production and associated economic benefits. We evaluate vegetation responses with tebuthiurón application in doses of 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 kg of a.i./ha, applied by triplicate in 20 by 30 m plots. A completely randomized block design was used and information was analyzed by ANOVA (P≤0.05). The herbicide controlled 31, 65.5 and 95.5% of shrubs with 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 kg of a.i./ha with forage production increases of 147.6, 250.4 and 424.5%, respectively, as compared to untreated areas. Cumulative total ten year dry forage production was 2.45, 5.10, 7.70 and 12.18 ton/ha in plots treated with 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 kg/ha, with a forage production cost of $ 0.46, 0.37 y 0.27 pesos per additional kilogram of dry produced forage, respectively. We conclude that deteriorated grasslands invaded with shrubs have low production potential. From the financial view point it is economically profitable to apply tebuthiuron herbicide at rates of 0.5 to 1.5 kg a.i./ha to reduce high infestations of catclaw mimosa invasion on grasslands.
Suggested Citation
Ibarra Flores, F.A. & Martín Rivera, S. & Moreno Medina, M. & Denogean Ballesteros, F.G. & Martinez Duran, Ana B. & Retes López, R. & De La Toba García, V.M. & Aguilar Valdes, Alfredo, 2014.
"Beneficios Económicos Asociados Con El Control De Invasiones De Uña De Gato En El Pastizal Mediano Abierto De Cananea, Sonora, México,"
Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, Sociedad Mexicana de Administracion Agropecuaria, vol. 34(January-J), pages 1-11.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:remeag:163833
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163833
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remeag:163833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somexea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.