Author
Listed:
- Leismann, Edison Luiz
- Carmona, Charles Ulises de Montreuil
Abstract
Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a sustentabilidade financeira das Cooperativas de Crédito Singulares do Brasil. A análise dos dados financeiros das cooperativas de crédito, Sociedades de Crédito ao Microempreendedor (SCM) e crédito mútuo compõem o objeto de estudo. A análise foi realizada a partir dos dados de 31/12/2007 disponibilizados pelo Banco Central de 1.439 instituições. Com dados adicionais de 31 instituições liquidadas entre 2003 e 2006, totalizaram-se 1.470 instituições analisadas. Com os valores originais, o banco de dados foi dividido aleatoriamente em duas partes, cada qual com 735 instituições, sendo o primeiro denominado de amostra de desenvolvimento e o segundo, de amostra de validação. A avaliação principal foi feita a partir da Análise Discriminante com os dados obtidos e com padronização. Outras abordagens foram desenvolvidas e comparadas. Os resultados mostram que a segunda abordagem, com padronização e subdivisão das instituições por tamanho (valor do ativo) permite obter resultados mais aprimorados, com Correlação Canônica de 0,994, mostrando que a variável dependente pode ser explicada em 98,8% pelas variáveis independentes. Desta forma, as análises mostram a funcionalidade dessas abordagens como instrumento de classificação, servindo como mecanismo de auxílio aos órgãos reguladores e Cooperativas Centrais no acompanhamento das unidades singulares......This work aims to analyze the financial sustainability of Single Credit Cooperatives of Brazil. The analysis of financial data from credit cooperatives, credit societies of Small Entrepreneur (SCM) and credit make up the mutual object of study. The analysis was performed from the data available from 2007/12/31 by the Central Bank of Brazil of 1,439 institutions. We used indicators of financial structure, assets and the statements of results of those institutions. With additional data from 31 institutions presented between 2003 and 2006, the total is 1,470 institutions analyzed. With the original values, database was divided randomly into two parts, each one with 735 institutions, and the first known sample of development and the second called the validation sample. Other approaches have been developed. The main evaluation was made from the Discriminant Analysis. The results show that the alternative approach with subdivision of standardization and institutions by size (value of assets) to obtain more refined results. Thus, the analysis shows the functionality of these approaches as a tool for classification, serving as a mechanism to help regulatory agencies and the Cooperative Central monitoring of natural units.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rdecag:151965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.