Author
Listed:
- Li, Sasha
- Boehlje, Michael
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed increasing volatility in crop prices and yields, fertilizer prices, and farm asset values. In this study, the financial performance of illustrative Mid-west grain farms with different scales, tenure status, and capital structures was exam-ined under the shocks of volatile crop prices, yields, fertilizer prices, farmland value, and cash rent. Illustrative farms of 550, 1,200, and 2,500 acres were constructed reflecting the production activity for these farms with three different farmland ownership struc-tures (15%, 50%, and 85% of land owned) and two capital structures measured by debt- to- asset ratio (25% and 50%). Absolute measures and financial ratios were used to evaluate the income, cash flow, debt servicing, and equity position of these illustrative farms. The “stress test” results suggest that farms with modest size (i.e., 550 acres) and a large proportion of their land rented are very vulnerable irrespective of their leverage positions. Large- size farms with modest leverage (25% debt- to- asset ratio) that combine rental and ownership of the land they operated have strong financial performance and limited vulnerability to price, cost, yield, and asset value shocks. And these farms can increase their leverage positions significantly (from 25% to 50% in this study) with only modest deterioration in their financial performance and a slight increase in their vulner-ability. These results suggest that the perspective that farmers are resilient to price, cost, yield, and asset value shocks because of the current low use of debt in the industry (an average of about 13% debt- to- asset ratio for the farming sector) does not adequately recognize the financial vulnerable of many typical family farms to those shocks.
Suggested Citation
Li, Sasha & Boehlje, Michael, 2017.
"Financial Vulnerability of Midwest Grain Farms: Implications of Price, Yield, and Cost Shocks,"
Journal of Applied Farm Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(2).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:pujafe:302991
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302991
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pujafe:302991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dapurus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.