Author
Listed:
- Bednarek-Szczepanska, Maria
Abstract
The aim of the article was to characterize and assess the comments submitted to draft local spatial development plans for rural areas. The review included lists of comments to 74 draft local plans for rural areas of four different types, adopted in the years 2010–2022. These lists contained a total of 2109 comments. The subject of the analysis was the number of comments, their subject matter, and the occurrence of collective comments. Draft local plans do not usually arouse interest among residents, and comments to them are submitted by individuals, even when these plans cover the area of a village or several villages. The most controversial are the planning arrangements in the areas around the capitals of voivodeships, except for the smallest ones. The desire to change the purpose of land for housing development, opposition to a potentially burdensome investment, and the location of roads were the most common thematic categories of comments. Based on three features, types of formal social reaction to the draft plan were proposed. In over 1/3 of all analyzed cases, this reaction was negligible. In addition, two types can be distinguished: an intense, thematically focused collective reaction (occurring in the event of a controversial investment location) and a weak, thematically focused individual reaction (most often expressing the desire of property owners to change the intended use of the land). The article is based on the results of research financed by the National Science Centre (project: "Mechanisms and effects of local community influence on decision-making in the processes of shaping non-urban space", grant number 2021/43/D/HS4/01720).
Suggested Citation
Bednarek-Szczepanska, Maria, 2024.
"Questioning planning arrangements by submitting comments to local spatial development plans for rural areas in Poland,"
Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 203(2), July.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:polvaa:345031
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345031
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polvaa:345031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irwirpl.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.