Author
Abstract
Since the beginning of human civilization, the land has been creating certain utilities which satisfy human needs. When the dangerous side effects of industrial agriculture have occurred intrinsic land utilities are being discovered anew. They have a nature of public goods and constitute a hard core of the new agriculture paradigm. Despite irreversible accumulation of capital in the anthropogenic environment many new utilities of the land come into existence without additional capital and labour outlay. Since they are public goods, they are paid from taxes in great measure and then by the subsidies for agriculture of CAP. This way an intrinsic land utility takes a form of a financial product and can be called “intrinsic productivity” of land. According to the “induced innovation model of agricultural development” there exist mechanisms for this sector’s participation in contributing to economic development as well as in sharing its benefits. Nonetheless, inefficiencies of the market that distort market signals, constitute a barrier of the latter process. Therefore, so-called “surplus drainage” from agriculture takes place. Author claims that it is possible to objectively measure a “surplus drainage” from agriculture as a result of a market failure, i.e. information asymmetry. For that reason the drainage has to be compensated to correct this failure. The mentioned premises imply that the CAP’s subsidies should not be perceived as the political rents according to its classical definition. Only a part of subsidies left after subtracting a value of “surplus drainage” and a compensation of public goods has a hallmark of the rent. A valuation of these values is an important scientific challenge.
Suggested Citation
Czyżewski, Bazyli, 2015.
"Renty polityczne w nowym paradygmacie rolnictwa – rozważania na przykładzie gospodarstwa reprezentatywnego FADN w Polsce,"
Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(6), December.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:paaero:233479
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.233479
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:233479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.