Author
Listed:
- Manoel, Aviner Augusto Silva
- Santos, David Ferreira Lopes
- Moraes, Marcelo Botelho da Costa
Abstract
Within the theory of finance, capital structure is one of the most important and controversial themes. Disagreements concerning the possible existence of an optimal capital structure, and the possibility that other reasons explain how organizations define their capital structure, have persisted over the years. Several studies have already been conducted on this subject. However, despite advances, there is still a long way to go. In this context, this study aimed to analyze the debt and the determinants of mills and distilleries of Brazilian sugarcane industry in the period from 1998 to 2013, considering the study restriction regarding this topic in the industry. In terms of methodology, the present study is descriptive and quantitative in nature. The method chosen for the data analysis was the regression model with panel data. The consolidated annual financial statements of the mills and distilleries were collected from the base of the Gazeta Mercantil, on the websites of both organizations and in the publications in the Diário Oficial da União. Based on a sample of 16 industry organizations on a balanced panel, the results showed that, on average, the plants use 62.5% of third party capital to finance their investments. The factors profitability, growth variation, size, and type of capital proved decisive, while cash generation was not statistically significant. Finally, we conclude that the sugar-energy sector is more aligned with the Pecking Order theory
Suggested Citation
Manoel, Aviner Augusto Silva & Santos, David Ferreira Lopes & Moraes, Marcelo Botelho da Costa, 2016.
"Determinantes Do Endividamento Na Indústria Sucroenergética Brasileira: Análise A Partir Das Teorias De Estrutura De Capital,"
Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 18(2), April.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:orarao:265510
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.265510
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:265510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deflabr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.