IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/orarao/262702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

286 S. C. et al. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, Lavras, v. 15, n. 2, p. 286-300, 2013 GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA: UMA ANÁLISE DA APLICABILIDADE DOS SEUS CONCEITOS NA ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA

Author

Listed:
  • De Benedicto, Samuel Carvalho
  • Guimarães Júnior, Ernani de Souza
  • Pereira, José Roberto
  • Nogueira de Andrade, Gustavo Henrique

Abstract

O presente estudo, de natureza teórica, tem como objetivo analisar a aplicabilidade dos conceitos da governança corporativa na administração pública, diante do contexto atual que demanda eficiência, responsabilidade, ética, transparência e prestação de contas. Para tanto, construiu-se uma revisão teórica pautada nos pilares e princípios das boas práticas de governança corporativa e governança pública. Sabe-se que, no Brasil, desde o Período Colonial coexistiu uma gama de fatores contrários aos princípios da governança pública, tais como: patrimonialismo, clientelismo, personalismo, ineficiência nos gastos públicos, corrupção, centralização de poder, corporativismo, excesso de burocracia, dentre outros. O estudo mostra que essas práticas estão sendo gradativamente superadas que e novos parâmetros administrativos os quais indicam proximidade com as boas práticas de governança são introduzidos na gestão pública brasileira. Entretanto, ainda se percebe estar distante do modelo de um Estado justo e transparente. As discussões realizadas neste estudo evidenciam que o modelo de administração pública no Brasil ainda se encontra impregnado de mazelas, impropriedades e condutas recrimináveis, as quais precisam ser superadas à luz dos princípios da governança. ----- The present study, theoretical in nature, is intended to investigate the applicability of the corporative governance concepts in public administration, given the current context, which demands efficiency, responsibility, ethics, transparency and income statement. So, a theoretical review ruled by the pillars and principles of good corporative governance and public governance practices was constructed. It is known that, in Brazil, since the Colonial Period, coexisted a range of contrary factors to the principles of public governance, such as: patrimonialism, clientelism, personalism, inefficiency in government spending, corruption, centralization of power, corporativism, excess of bureaucracy, among others. The study shows that these practices have been gradually overcome and new administrative parameters, which indicate closeness to the good practices of governance, having been introduced into the Brazilian public administration. However, it is still perceived to be distant from a model of a State both fair and transparent. The discussions presented in this study stood out that the model of public administration in Brazil are still impregnated with setbacks, improprieties and blameworthy behaviors, which need to be overcome to the light of the governance principles.

Suggested Citation

  • De Benedicto, Samuel Carvalho & Guimarães Júnior, Ernani de Souza & Pereira, José Roberto & Nogueira de Andrade, Gustavo Henrique, 2013. "286 S. C. et al. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, Lavras, v. 15, n. 2, p. 286-300, 2013 GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA: UMA ANÁLISE DA APLICABILIDADE DOS SEUS CONCEITOS NA ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA," Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 15(2), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:262702
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262702/files/683-1441-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262702/files/683-1441-1-PB.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:262702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deflabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.