Author
Listed:
- Onikoyi, M. P.
- Olutegbe, N. S.
- Adeyemo, A. A.
Abstract
The study determined rural women?s perception of market-related sharp practices in Kwara state, Nigeria. A total of 120 interview schedules were administered on rural market women and information were obtained on their personal characteristics, perceived common market-related sharp practices, perception of sharp practices and other factors perceived to influence perpetration of sharp practices among respondents. Both descriptive and inferential statistical tools were employed in analyzing the data. Results reveal that majority were Muslims (62.5%), married (71.7%), had no formal education (51.7%), while 50.8% were food stuff sellers. The average age and household size were 42 years and 7 persons, respectively. Common sharp practices perceived to be perpetrated were use of wrong scale (94.2%), adjustment of measuring device (85.0%) and bagging of commodities with stones (80.8%). Although a large proportion (61.7%) of the respondents condemned sharp practices by their perceptions, several other factors such as lack of measurement standard (mean = 1.77), customers? ignorance of consequences (mean = 1.71), poor supervision by designated government agencies (mean = 1.66) and lack of fear of God (mean = 1.63) were perceived to account for high level of market-related sharp practices. Respondents? level of education (?2 = 9.404) and household size (r = -0.209) were significantly related to their perception of sharp practices. The study concluded that although respondents? perception of sharp practices was unfavourable, other non-behavioural factors may have forced the rural market women to engage in perpetration of such practices.
Suggested Citation
Onikoyi, M. P. & Olutegbe, N. S. & Adeyemo, A. A., 2020.
"Rural Women’s Perception of Market-Related Sharp Practices in Kwara State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 16(01), September.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348484
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348484
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.