Author
Listed:
- Adejuwon, O. T.
- Oyesola, O. B.
Abstract
Rural infrastructural development has a crucial role to play in the development of any nation. Despite the efforts of the three tiers of governments in Nigeria and that of the international organisations to improve rural wellbeing, most of the infrastructural development efforts have not been sustainable. Therefore, this study assessed the benefits derived from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) facilitated boreholes in rural areas of Ondo State, Nigeria. Three stage sampling procedure was used to obtain data from 152 beneficiaries in the study area. Information on socioeconomic characteristics, level of use of the infrastructure, constraints to use of the infrastructure, and benefits derived from the infrastructure were obtained using both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection; information obtained were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Majority (66.5%) of the respondents were between the age range of 31 and 60 years with mean age of 44 ? 14.28, 55.3% had a household size of between 1 and 5 people, 61.2% were female, 95.4% had formal education, 60.5% were Christians, and 59.9% were married. High percentage (98.6%) of the respondents stated that borehole was not in use always. The highest ranked constraints faced by the beneficiaries in the use of the borehole was lack of maintenance (x?=1.14). The major benefit derived was provision of drinkable water (x?=1.87). Significant relationship existed between level of use of the infrastructure (r= -0.358, p=0.002) and the benefits derived from the infrastructure. It was therefore concluded that the beneficiaries did not benefit from the infrastructure as expected due to low level of use.
Suggested Citation
Adejuwon, O. T. & Oyesola, O. B., 2020.
"Benefits derived from Millennium Development Goals facilitated boreholes in rural areas of Ondo state, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 18(2), September.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348472
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348472
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.