Author
Listed:
- Tanko, I. B.
- Yusuf, H. O.
- Shuaibu, H.
Abstract
Recognizing the myriad of deficiencies inherent in the use of inorganic fertilisers in developing countries, many agricultural-based agencies have advocated the use of organic fertilizers as an alternative to inorganic fertilizers. Therefore, this study described the constraints to the use of NARICT neem organic fertilizer among smallholder tomato farmers in Kaduna state. Four Local Government Areas (LGAs) were randomly selected from the four ADP zones of the state. One village was randomly selected from each of the four selected LGAs and then 11% of the tomato farmers from each of the four villages were randomly selected to arrive at the sample size. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and both inferential and descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the assembled data. The major constraint to the use of NARICT neem fertilizer was availability with 52.3% of the farmers, acknowledging it as a constraint and was ranked 1st, with slow action being ranked 2nd with about 45.6% while the high cost of transportation was ranked 4th with 41.7%. The average productivity of tomatoes in the study area was 1,820.3kg per hectare for non-NARICT organic fertilizer users, while for NARICT fertilizer users, their average tomato productivity was 2,226.11kg per hectare. Based on the research findings, it was concluded that even though NARICT neem organic fertilizer had some major use constraints, in the study area, its use results in some significant level of influence on the farmer's productivity and income.
Suggested Citation
Tanko, I. B. & Yusuf, H. O. & Shuaibu, H., 2023.
"Constraints to the use of NARICT neem organic fertiliser among smallholder tomato farmers in Kaduna state, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 23(2), September.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348364
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348364
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.