IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ngnjrs/347396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional Wellbeing Analysis of Women Analysis of Women Farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ekanem, J. T.
  • Nkeme, K. K.
  • Umoh, I. U.
  • Umoh, I. M.

Abstract

Women farmers remain a vital segment of the rural population and create critical links between the present generation of farmers and the future. The rationale for more studies on the issues of their wellbeing is anchored on the sustained development of approaches that give a better understanding of the phenomenon. This study examined the multidimensional wellbeing of women farmers in Akwa Ibom State using a functioning approach. The study specifically assessed the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers and analysed the wellbeing of the farmers using six functioning dimensions including information access, employment, education, nutrition and health, autonomy, housing, and sanitation. Primary data were obtained from 300 respondents selected from the agricultural zones in the state through a multi-stage sampling procedure. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics and fuzzy set analysis. The mean age of women farmers in the zones was 46 years and their mean household size was six. Majority (76%) of the respondents from Eket agricultural zone fell within 0.401-0.50 wellbeing index spread across four of the six dimensions considered, 67% of the respondents in Uyo agricultural zone fell within 0.301-0.40 wellbeing index while 56% of the respondents from Abak agricultural zone fell within 0.20 – 0.30 wellbeing index across the dimensions. Although the wellbeing status of women farmers from Eket agricultural zone was relatively better, the results showed that the wellbeing of the women farmers across the agricultural zones was generally low. Interventions in employment, education, and information access are needed for the women farmers, especially, in Abak agricultural zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekanem, J. T. & Nkeme, K. K. & Umoh, I. U. & Umoh, I. M., 2022. "Multidimensional Wellbeing Analysis of Women Analysis of Women Farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 22(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347396
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347396/files/Multidimensional%20wellbeing%20analysis%20of%20women%20farmers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2008. "Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 1-102.
    2. Omobowale Ayoola Oni & Temitayo Adenike Adepoju, 2014. "Analysis of rural households’ wellbeing in Nigeria: a capability approach," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(9), pages 760-779, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Carver & Arthur Grimes, 2019. "Income or Consumption: Which Better Predicts Subjective Well‐Being?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(S1), pages 256-280, November.
    2. Niclas Berggren & Christian Bjørnskov, 2023. "Does legal freedom satisfy?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Eleftherios Giovanis, 2014. "Relationship between well-being and recycling rates: evidence from life satisfaction approach in Britain," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 201-214, July.
    4. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Household Income and Personality Traits," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 86, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    5. Qianping Ren & Maoliang Ye, 2017. "Donations Make People Happier: Evidence from the Wenchuan Earthquake," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 517-536, May.
    6. Anderson, Michael L. & Lu, Fangwen & Zhang, Yiran & Yang, Jun & Qin, Ping, 2016. "Superstitions, street traffic, and subjective well-being," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-10.
    7. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01112725 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Senik, Claudia, 2014. "The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 379-401.
    9. Leschke, Martin, 2015. "Alternativen zur Marktwirtschaft: Ein kritischer Blick auf die Ansätze von Niko Paech und Christian Felber aus Sicht der konstitutionellen Ökonomik," Beiträge zur Jahrestagung 2015 (Bayreuth) 140887, Verein für Socialpolitik, Ausschuss für Wirtschaftssysteme und Institutionenökonomik.
    10. Yamada, Katsunori & Sato, Masayuki, 2013. "Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-57.
    11. Djankov, Simeon & Nikolova, Elena & Zilinsky, Jan, 2016. "The happiness gap in Eastern Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 108-124.
    12. Paul Welfens & Jens Perret & Deniz Erdem, 2010. "Global economic sustainability indicator: analysis and policy options for the Copenhagen process," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 153-185, August.
    13. Jason Brennan, 2012. "For-Profit Business as Civic Virtue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 313-324, March.
    14. Richard Eckersley, 2009. "Population Measures of Subjective Wellbeing: How Useful are they?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Klaus Wälde, 2016. "Emotion Research in Economics," Working Papers 1611, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    16. Ricardo Perez-Truglia, 2020. "The Effects of Income Transparency on Well-Being: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1019-1054, April.
    17. Daniel W. Sacks & Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2010. "Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth," Working Paper Series 2010-28, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    18. Stefano Bartolini & Francesco Sarracino, 2021. "Happier and Sustainable. Possibilities for a post-growth society," Department of Economics University of Siena 855, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    19. Du, Qingyuan & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2013. "A theory of the competitive saving motive," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 275-289.
    20. Ehrmann, Michael & Tzamourani, Panagiota, 2012. "Memories of high inflation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 174-191.
    21. Xiaogeng Xu & Satu Metsälampi & Michael Kirchler & Kaisa Kotakorpi & Peter Hans Matthews & Topi Miettinen, 2023. "Which income comparisons matter to people, and how? Evidence from a large field experiment," Working Papers 10, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor and Human Capital;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.