Author
Listed:
- Abolade, T. J.
- Meludu, N. T.
Abstract
Tomato is an important fruit vegetable which provides numerous nutrients to the body. Despite the level of production, postharvest loss is frightening at the rate of 30-50% annually as a result of poor handling. The previous studies have not investigated the level of engagement in tomato handling. Therefore, this study investigated the level of engagement of farmers on tomato postharvest handling activities. Multistage sampling procedure was used to select 231 respondents. Structured questionnaire was used to obtain data on farmers’ socio-economic characteristics, level of engagement in tomato postharvest handling activities and rate of losses, while descriptive (Frequency distribution, mean and standard deviation) and inferential (PPMC) statistical tools were used for analysis. Majority of tomato farmers (94.8%) were found to be male with 15 years of farming experience (63.6%). Larger proportion (41.6%) had 1-2 acres of tomato farm and majority (54.1%) produced less than 5000kg of tomato annually. Most (65.4%) had low engagement level in postharvest handling of tomato and majority (58.9%) incurred high rate of losses. There was significant relationship between years of experience (r= -0.163, p<0.05), farm size (r= 0.279, p<0.05), quantity of tomato produced (r = 0.272, p<0.05) and losses incurred. Significant relationship also existed between level of engagement (r = -0.163, p<0.05) and the rate of losses incurred. The study therefore recommends that government and other NGOs should assist tomato farmers with processing and storage facilities. Also extension agents should organise workshop and training for farmers on modern techniques of postharvest handling of tomato to improve their level of engagement in order to reduce the rate of losses incurred.
Suggested Citation
Abolade, T. J. & Meludu, N. T., 2020.
"Farmers' Engagement in Tomato Postharvest Handling Activities and Rate of Losses in Kaduna State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 20(2), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347355
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347355
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.