Author
Listed:
- Idris-Adeniyi, K. M.
- Busari, A. O.
- Olawale, M. O.
Abstract
This study analysed gender disparities in access to farm credit among farming households in Iwo Agricultural Zone of Osun State, Nigeria. Multistage sampling procedure was used to select sixty each, of male and female farming household heads as study sample. Gender disaggregated primary data were collected on socioeconomic characteristics, sources of credit, volume of credit granted and constraints to credit access. Data were analysed using descriptive (frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation and ranking) statistics. Results reveal that mean ages of male and female farmers were 50±1.45 and 52±1.56 years respectively, 31.7% and 41.7% were married with mean household size of 5 and 4 persons for male and female farmers, respectively. Average farm sizes were 4±0.17 and 3±0.15ha, while the mean years of farming experience was 8±0.15 years and 6±0.13 years for male and female farmers, respectively. Results further reveal that all (100.0%) the respondents obtained farm credit from cooperative societies while the other meaningful sources of credit were money lenders (males 20.0%, females 30.0%) and microfinance banks (males 23.8%, females 16.7%). The major constraints to credit access included lack of collateral (males 1.76, females 1.88), high interest rate (males 1.72, females 1.88) and late approval of loans (males 1.64, females 1.58). The study concluded that both gender have access to credit through cooperative societies, but males had better access to credit from formal financial institutions, hence, credit institutions in the study area should grant timely low interest credit to both gender and possibly waive the required collaterals for farmers.
Suggested Citation
Idris-Adeniyi, K. M. & Busari, A. O. & Olawale, M. O., 2019.
"Gender Disparities in Access to Credit Among Farming Households in Iwo Agricultural Zone of Osun State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 19(2), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347325
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347325
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.